Menu:

Recent Entries

Categories

Ethics [77]
Legal [26]
Politics [122]
General [5]
World Culture/Travel [45]
Speeding Towards a Police State [31]
Excellence [18]
Facts, Quotes, and Whatnot [77]
Philosophy [74]
Computers/Technology [32]
Movies [8]
Business/Finance [7]
Ecology [7]
Science [10]
Education [4]
Health/Nutrition [6]
Spiritual/Religion [5]
Literature [11]
Inventions [6]
Psychology [1]
Reference [1]
Art [1]

Links

Listed at...
- Bloggernity
Other Good Stuff
Primary Links
- The Free State Project
- Cato Unbound
- FactCheck.org
Read These Blogs
- Jono Pinsky's Blog
- Hitched to Everything
- Samizdata
- The International Libertarian
- A Stitch in Haste

Syndicate

RSS 0.90
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Version:

andreas01 v1.3

Old Media, New Media, Transparency and People

cn | 18 December, 2006 12:45

At Buzz Machine, Jeff Jarvis has a great viewpoint on a post the editor of Wired Magazine, Chris Anderson, has on his blog - The Long Tail, about what he calls 'Radical Transparency'.  Jarvis writes:

I do think the truly radical transformation would be to stop looking at the magazine as a thing — a product in print or online — but as a community, for that is what magazines really are and always have been: people who rather around the stuff they all like or need. See my earlier blather on the notion here. The point is that what you really want to do is open the windows on either side of your house and let the people standing around talk directly to each other, with or without you. You do your job, still, creating some stuff that people want to gather around. But then you enable them to share more. And now you have a new role — helping them. So you end up bigger than a magazine.

A few bullet points on Anderson's ideas (found in full here):

Anderson points out what he sees as both the upsides and risks of each item and there's a lot to be said of his ideas.  One of the primary concerns I would have is that I read magazines such as Wired for informed, interesting stories written by professionals and if every Tom, Dick, and Harry started participating in the process, I believe the content - the integrity of the journalism - might lose some credibility.  I make the assumption that the professional journalist, while probably not entirely objective, at least has the intent of objectivity, while the average person might not be considering objectivity as important or even relevant.  This might be less important to a magazine such as Wired due to the nature of their content, but still...I'd balk at data provided by the masses, so to speak...

Posted in Computers/Technology . Comment: (0). Trackbacks:(0). Permalink
«Next post | Previous post»

Comments

Leave a Reply

 authimage